Guilford conservatives get campaign season underway with political picnic

















Bill Randall (right) poses with fellow candidate Howard Coble and Conservatives for Guilford County activist Isabella Adkins.

Notwithstanding the efforts of Conservatives for Guilford County to establish a nonpartisan movement, the candidates that showed up for the group’s Take Back America Picnic at Bur-Mil Park yesterday evening were all Republicans, with the exception of one unaffiliated school board candidate.

A representative of the John Locke Foundation handed out “Tea Bags” – plastic bags containing the foundation’s publications and membership information – and told spectators that they have been working with dozens of candidates across the state, including the Republican nominee for the NC Senate District 28 seat in Guilford County. Hyde and NC House District 57 candidate Jon Hardister are both avowed fans of the Locke Foundation’s body of research and policy recommendations.

Estimated at upwards of 200 people by organizers, the crowd was fired up and energized. Guilford County Republican Party Chairman Bill Wright said he feels the party is fielding good candidates this year.

The star appearance may have been Bill Randall, who only three days earlier had trounced primary opponent Bernie Reeves in a runoff for US House District 13. Randall strolled around the grounds at the event early in the evening with 13-term Republican incumbent congressman Howard Coble, who introduced the new nominee from Raleigh to voters in his native Guilford County. Coble represents US House District 6. The two were a picture of old hand and young upstart, the seasoned incumbent who fended off a handful of primary contenders and the GOP challenger seeking to take on liberal Democrat Brad Miller.

Eating a hamburger under the shelter before the program of candidate remarks began, Randall reflected on Reeves’ sore-loser remark to the News & Observer that “it's sort of like anarchy out there.” The new nominee said his former opponent made some “strategic errors,” including disrespecting the Tea Party movement.

“One of the problems he had with that is his disparaging remarks were a matter of record,” Randall said. “And when confronted with it, he didn’t come clean. All he had to say is that ‘I did make remarks to that effect, although they may have been misconstrued or come across as more harsh than I intended,’” adding that Reeves should have then stated that he recognized the validity of sentiments held by Tea Party adherents.

“He has a lot to offer the Republican Party,” Randall continued. “He would do well to try to unify the base rather than divide the base. He missed a great opportunity because he didn’t concede with grace. The problem is that Bernie Reeves could not discern that there are some traditional Republicans who embrace the ideology of the Tea Party. And when you disparage the Tea Party you disparage those people who are rock-solid Republicans.”

Bill Randall, candidate for US House District 13

“Raise your hand if you’ve ever heard the argument that we need to get rid of illegal immigrants because they’re taking up welfare benefits and lining up in the emergency rooms – how many of you have ever heard that argument? Stop it. Stay with me. That’s not the argument. I say again, that’s not the argument.

“There are illegals in this country who’ve not once gone to emergency rooms, that are hardworking and industrious. But that’s not the argument. Because, see, if you argue from the standpoint of what they’re taking away in benefits, you’re disarmed when someone can prove that they’re not using them. Follow me. We need to learn how to craft our argument based on the US Constitution: And what’s at stake is the rule of law. Amen?

“Let’s say that you all went on a trip. Bill Randall comes to your neighborhood. I know you’re out of town. I break into your home. Inside your home I find everything in disarray. Some of you say, ‘Well, you see my teenagers at home’ – no, that’s… I’ve got kids, too. I find everything in disarray. Dishes stacked to the ceiling in the kitchen. Clothes in the laundry room, dirty, piled up. Windows dirty. Yard not cut. Everything is a mess. I go in there, wash all your dishes, sparkling clean, put ’em up in your cabinet, wash all the clothes, fold ’em, put ’em away, even iron your shirts, even clean the toilet bowl. Go into your refrigerator and I take things out and I cook a sumptuous meal. And that sumptuous meal is waiting on you when you get back home. Folks, you come in. You like what you see. But you get on the phone and you call the police. And I get carted away to jail. Is that the right thing to do or the wrong thing to do? It’s the right thing because I broke the rule of law. I don’t care what my intentions are; the rule of law is what prevails in this country.”


Jeff Hyde, a member of Conservatives for Guilford County who is challenging one-term Democrat Don Vaughan for the NC Senate District 27 seat, was introduced by his friend Brett Riddleberger as a “hardcore conservative.”

Jeff Hyde, candidate for NC Senate District 27

“North Carolina is struggling with prosperity. A once great state – still is a great state – we have beautiful aesthetics all across our state. We’ve got a great talent base. We have natural resources, but we are on our way with our state government to becoming New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, New York or Michigan, and I don’t think North Carolinians want that. I know that I don’t want that. Unemployment in North Carolina has been for 15 straight months above 10 percent. Democrats have no idea how to change that. Our solution is to take North Carolina from being the worst business-climate state in the Southeast and make it competitive with our Southeastern neighbors by reducing the tax burden on individuals, the tax burden on corporations, reducing our state gasoline tax – all these things add up to make North Carolina the 10th least likely state for businesses to succeed. The states around us – there’s no surprise – the nine states with the most economic activity are the nine states that don’t have a personal income tax. There’s no surprise in that. If we want North Carolina to be prosperous again, if we want to reduce our unemployment, we’ll put our money back into the private sector where we can incubate jobs around the kitchen table and entice new businesses to form in North Carolina and put private citizens back to work.”


Trudy Wade, a two-term member of the Greensboro City Council, is running for the open seat vacated by Democrat Katie Dorsett against two opponents: Democrat Gladys Robinson and independent Bruce Davis.

Trudy Wade, candidate for NC Senate District 28

“I now have two opponents. If you haven’t heard the news, I now have an unaffiliated running against me. One thing I want to make very clear about the two candidates running against me in Senate District 28: Both will vote for a tax increase, I can assure you of that. One has a proven record of voting for tax increases, and the other has openly stated that she’d be in favor in tax increases. You don’t have to worry about that with me. You can look at my record on the Greensboro City Council, and I haven’t voted for any tax increases.

“The other thing I want to bring to your attention is I’m worried about jobs because there’s not a lot of jobs out there for us and we definitely need to do something about that. What do we need to do? I’m a small business owner. We need to give small businesses a break and let us put people back to work because it is the only way we’re going to get this economy going again. Give me a break, let me pay somebody a salary, let them go out and buy from you and everyone else that runs a small business. Let us all get back to work.

“The other thing is I want to take care of some of that corruption in Raleigh. We need to get out; we need to vote. I can’t change it without you. If you don’t go out and vote this time we won’t get a change in Raleigh. But I can assure you, if you go out and vote and I’m elected, you will have a change in Raleigh.”


John Blust, who faces a nominal challenge from Libertarian Jeffery Simon, has become something of a role model for GOP candidates seeking legislative office in Raleigh, especially with the retirement of fellow Republican Laura Wiley in NC House District 61. Although he faces no Democratic opponent in his race, he’s weathered adversity by virtue of the fact that his entire career in the General Assembly has been spent as part of the minority party. He recruited Theresa Yon to run in Democratic-leaning District 59, and his limited government philosophy is emulated by another Republican challenger, District 57 candidate Jon Hardister.

John Blust, candidate for NC House District 62

“If you want to know why this is so important, turn around and look at those children back there. The latest figures I have seen say that the federal government has an unfunded liability, if you know what that means in accounting. It’s bad enough that we have a national debt right now that just went over $13 trillion; it’s approaching the level of the gross national product. The unfunded liability, what are the promises made by the politicians all these years is numbered now at $130 trillion, and somehow those children back there are going to have to come up with this money. Now, the opposition likes to think that they are pro-child; they claim to be pro-education, pro-child. And one of the tasks we have to do is we have to take them off their moral high ground and capture it ourself, because you are not for the children in any way if you are willing to saddle them with $130 trillion in debt. Don’t tell me you’re for the children.

“Don’t tell me you’re for education when the only education model we’ve seen is the one we’ve seen. They won’t allow us to go to charter schools. They won’t allow us to go to money-follows-the-student. We have some of the worst public schools K-12, but we have some of the best universities. Now, what’s the difference there? The universities you choose where to go. The students, the parents choose where to go. The K-12 is a monopoly. We debated a bill not long ago on how to handle low-performing, non-performing schools. This is 2010. I couldn’t help but be struck that this is 2010, and two education governors ago we had an education governor named Jim Hunt that said that if you spent the money they wanted to spend and you enacted the very agenda they wanted and they got their way on everything, every initiative, every cent they wanted for education is what happened, Jim Hunt said you’d be number-one by 2010. And here 2010 came and we were having to debate ways to handle non-performing, low-performing schools. And that was with Jim Hunt, “the education governor” from 1992 to 2010, then Mike Easley, soon to be indicted, an “education governor” from 2000 to 2008. Now, what happened? Maybe their fundamental model was wrong. Maybe it’s not just the money. Maybe, instead of approaching every program as if it’s a matter of government programs, government money, we have now come to the cliff.”


Republican Theresa Yon is challenging veteran Democratic lawmaker Maggie Jeffus in NC House District 59.

Theresa Yon, candidate for NC House District 59

“Just last week, House Bill 1973, film tax credit… this is a bill that had a lot of different tax credits and spending that individually probably would not have been passed. They put it all under one bill, and you get the film tax credit. This gives up to $20 million in tax credits for people that come to North Carolina to film movies on our coast. That’s all well and good, but it doesn’t help Guilford County. Here’s the idea: There’s no way that our tax dollars should be paid to Hollywood actors and producers to come here and film movies. And our representative, John Blust, put out an amendment in which he said, ‘We need to cap that; we shouldn’t be paying actors or people that are paid, you know, millions of dollars to make movies.’ That amendment was voted down by the Democrats and my opponent. So if someone comes and films a movie for $80 million, you the taxpayers write them a check for $20 million regardless of how much they pay in taxes. If an actor gets paid $12 million, the taxpayers write a $3 million check to him – 25 percent of their production cost is going to be funded now by the taxpayers with House Bill 1973. I think that’s a bad decision.

“Yesterday – here’s a good example for government interfering in your lives a little bit too much. Just yesterday the House voted on a bill and it has to do with childcare. A lot of you work, and maybe in the summertime your children are in daycare. Well, they’ve decided on a couple things that they know better what your children need than you do. No child over 1 year old is allowed to have four to six ounces of juice per day in daycare. No children over 2 years old are allowed to drink any whole milk, reduced fat only. And you are not allowed to bring sugar-sweetened sodas to daycare anymore, or they’ll be confiscated. So if you give your child a Coke once in awhile to take to daycare, it will be taken away…. So, that’s a bit of a disappointment, government interfering in our lives.”


Jon Hardister’s reluctance to take a firm position on a piece of legislation proposed by his Democratic opponent, Pricey Harrison, that would eliminate the cap on liabilities for offshore oil spills off the coast of North Carolina has been the object of a fair amount of discussion. He said after this speech that he has now come to the conclusion that eliminating the cap is the right thing to do.

His stump speech was more of less boilerplate Republican agenda, with little attention to specifics.

Jon Hardister, candidate for NC House District 57

“A lot of people don’t realize how high our taxes are in North Carolina. We have the ninth highest income tax, and that’s both corporate and individual. I believe you create jobs through the private sector. The government can’t create jobs. If you look at Virginia, for example, their taxes are lower, [and] their unemployment rate is a lot lower than ours. We have an unemployment rate that’s just over 11 percent. In Virginia, it’s just over 6 percent. It’s much lower. I believe it all comes down to a simple question: Do you think that government is the solution to our problems or the cause of our problems? (Cause.) Exactly. And, uh, I gotta tell you: We have an opportunity, this year, to take back our government. Okay, I’m a Republican. I’m proud to be a Republican. But that’s not what it’s all about. It’s about principle. It’s about what you stand for. And we have a lot of work to do. Republicans have a great opportunity now to take the state House and take the state Senate, and get some work done. We need to eliminate wasteful spending and we need to go to zero-based budgeting. We need some spending-cap legislation and we need to eliminate the cap on charter schools. I’ll tell you what. Here’s how I look at it: When the economy started to get bad I had to tighten my belt, and I had to be careful about my expenditures. Government should do the same thing. It’s our money they’re spending. Politicians have a responsibility to be careful with spending policies.”


Lisa Ingle Clapp, an unaffiliated challenger, faces two-term Democrat Nancy Routh in the nonpartisan contest for one of the at-large seats on the Guilford County School Board.

Lisa Ingle Clapp, candidate for Guilford County School Board at large

“I think it’s very important to vote for a candidate who has children coming in and out of their doors every day, not just my own boys but their friends and their friends’ parents. And you know how we parents network and talk about what’s going on at the school level. A couple of things I wanted to make a point about. One thing is in Guilford County I think we lack in the school system, accountability, on a couple of different levels. The first level is I think we need to hold the Guilford County School Board accountable for how their spending our hard-earned tax dollars. I don’t know about you guys, but I’m a hard-working – my husband is a hard-working person and we pay lots of taxes, as all of you do as well. When you study up on what’s going on with the school board, you never know where your money’s going. And I think the truth and transparency approach to that would be very applicable at this point, especially since our superintendant, Mo Green, speaks of that in his strategic plan of transparency. So I’m running on transparency. If you want truth and transparency, I’m your girl.

“The other thing I wanted to bring forward was parent accountability. We need to hold our parents accountable to stay involved enough with their children that they know what’s going on inside of their school doors everyday. A lot of things take place in our schools that we don’t ever know about as the general public. That’s one of my biggest, biggest pet peeves with the school board, and one of the main reasons I decided to run. And I’ll tell you briefly about that and then I’ll close. When we have convicted felons who are bringing loaded handguns into high schools and middle schools, folks we got a problem. We got a problem with a school board who wants to do away with our SRO officers in the middle of our middle and high schools, because we need ’em. We need ’em desperately. And we need a voice on that school board who is going to keep those SRO officers in their positions. I’m sick and tired of taking my own two children to school and having to worry about their safety when they’re not on my watch. In order for us to make a difference in that, you’ve got to have truth and transparency. I have numerous e-mails and phone calls every single week since I’ve decided to run for school board at large from parents, and from staff and from teachers who tell me over and over the things that go on behind closed doors that nobody knows about because their acts of violence and they’re pushed under the rug, so to speak. Because we don’t need to know about it, as parents and taxpayers. I’m here to tell you: It’s time for us to face the music. We got to know what’s going on so that we can restore safety, discipline and respect back into our schools. If that’s what you want in a candidate – a voice for the people, for the students, for the staff and for the teachers and the parents, then on Nov. 2, vote Lisa Clapp for school board.”


Becki Gray, John Locke Foundation

“The forefathers also gave us a gift. That gift was freedom. But that gift has been abused, it’s been misused, it is in danger and it is in peril. Our country is in trouble. We have a healthcare bill that no one wanted, that was shoved through Congress and shoved down our throats. Spending is out of control. National security is at risk. We finally have a state that has stepped up and done something about illegal immigration, and what’s our president doing? He’s going to sue that state. We have a government that wants to do everything for everybody with no concern for what it costs. And all of these things are taking away our freedom, chipping away at that.

“So are we safe here in North Carolina? Are our state leaders protecting our freedoms? They’re not. We have corrupt politicians that we can’t trust who are lining their pockets with our tax money. Just read the latest edition of Carolina Journal to find out who’s been indicted today. And the list keeps getting longer and longer. Unemployment is in double digits and has been for the last 15 months. North Carolina has one of the highest tax rates in the Southeast. Government is everywhere in our lives, telling us how, when and where we can live to the point of being ridiculous. Do you know that there are counties in North Carolina, there are places in North Carolina where plastic bags have been outlawed? There’s a smoking ban in effect in North Carolina where the government is telling us where we can smoke in businesses we own. Now I’m not a big smoker – I’m not a smoker at all, I don’t like to be around cigarette smoke – what I really don’t like is the government telling me what I can do and can’t do in establishments that I own. They want to tell us where we can water our lawns, even in the mountains what color to paint our house, what kind of light bulbs to use, and all the while they’re continuing to increase the entitlement programs that people get more dependent, more government and more government control. And the cost of all this government in North Carolina: Do you know that since 1980, North Carolina’s budget has increased 190 percent? And during that period population has only grown 62 percent. So keep that in mind.”

Political roughhousing at the Conservatives for Guilford County picnic


John Blust shows fellow Republican state House candidate Jon Hardister what a political butt-whuppin' is all about at the Conservatives for Guilford County Take America Back Picnic yesterday.

Burying the hatchet...

Actually, Blust and Hardister were reenacting the Govenor Spencer-Nathan Tabor affray a couple weeks ago to allow Blust to make the point that if a white man attacked someone at a Democratic Party gathering the liberal media would have been all over it.

I'll have more serious coverage in the form of photos, quoted speeches, reporting and analysis on the blog this weekend and in print on Wednesday.

ADDENDUM: During his stump speech, Blust joked, "I don't know if I'm at the right rally, having read the media accounts over the last year [of] Tea Partiers. So far I have not witnessed a single act of violence yet. I haven't heard a single racial epithet. I haven't seen any threats made at all, so I wonder if I'm at the right place."

A public apology from Rev. Cardes Brown to Mayor Bill Knight

Statement made by the Rev. Cardes Brown at a press conference held at New Light Missionary Baptist Church in Greensboro on June 24:

"I think I want to apologize to Mayor Knight. Please put this down. I want to apologize to him because he made a statement sometime ago, and I challenged the statement. He made the statement that the chief was only made chief because he was black. And I stood up against that statement. And I have to really apologize to Mayor Knight because the more I research this the more I’m inclined to agree that, in part, he was right. He was only made chief because he was black and would show favor to the majority of officers on the force.”

The majority of officers on the force, it should be noted, are white.

Chief Tim Bellamy is scheduled to retire on July 31.


Some kind of hustle

I began my journalism career in New Orleans, La., where this kind of thing can happen, and then fester and grow.

The judge got it right: "Despicable."

More from the Fed who busted him: "It is a travesty when public officials use their position to enrich themselves at the expense of the citizens they are entrusted to represent. What is most reprehensible is when that occurs as the subject hides behind a church or charity, reducing the credibility of both the religious institution and the political office."

Greensboro police Chief Tim Bellamy's retirement memo

Rev. Gregory Headen, Pulpit Forum: June 24: “We are very concerned that we don’t get to the point where we bring in another chief without addressing these systemic and cultural evils. So I want to say that it would be a great mistake to assume that the retirement of Chief Bellamy would resolve the Greensboro Police Department’s problems. It is not one or two people that we’re engaging; it is a deeply entrenched culture. Additionally, it would be unwise, unworkable and unfair to bring another chief in on top of the corruption and double standards that now exist.”

Bellamy Retirement Memo to Young 011910


Pulpit Forum letter to Greensboro police Chief Tim Bellamy

Pulpit Forum, June 24: "On January 2010, the Pulpit Forum sent a letter to police Chief Timothy Bellamy with 97 specific questions and requested a response. The city manager, the mayor and all council members were copied. A meeting with City Manager Rashad Young was held in January; he promised to insure a response to these questions. To this date we have received no response."

The Pulpit Forum Letter to Tim Bellamy 2010


Candidate profile: Lon Cecil

Long a libertarian in philosophy, Lon Cecil ditched the Republican Party around the time of the 2008 election. The GOP has been adrift from its small-government ideals since the Reagan era, he said, and he has little faith that the party’s successive defeats in the past two cycles will force it to change its ways.

“My dissatisfaction with them is that they were doing nothing but raising taxes, passing more Democrat legislation and creating bigger government,” he said.

Libertarian Michael Munger’s candidacy for governor in 2008 and his showing of more than 2 percent in that contest ensures that the party will have a place on the North Carolina ballot at least through 2012, and Cecil hopes to be part of a handful of congressional hopefuls led by US Senate candidate Michael Beitler to break through this year.

Ironically, the election of Democrat Barack Obama to the White House begat a libertarian resurgence within the Republican Party, with the emergence of the Tea Party movement in early 2009.

“The Tea Party is an expression of the dissatisfaction of people that are mostly registered Republicans and some unaffiliated voters,” Cecil said. “They will merge them back in. They’ll say, ‘Come on back in, we’ve got to come together to beat those bad Democrats.’”

The 63-year-old Cecil, a High Point resident, is currently working on contract as an equipment tester for RM Micro Devices through the end of July, after which time he will be able to devote himself full time to his quest to win election to North Carolina’s 12th Congressional District seat. He was employed by RF Micro Devices for 12 years until March 2009, when he was part of a mass layoff.

That transition to free agency in the workforce somewhat parallels the brave new world of Cecil’s politics.

The 12th Congressional District, which has been represented by Democrat Mel Watt since 1993, is one of the most Democratic leaning in the state, having been drawn to give African Americans increased representation. That means not only the Libertarian candidate but also the Republican nominee face a high hurdle in persuading voters to cross party lines.

Cecil thinks the time is right.

“This economic downturn has affected a lot of people,” he said. “If you’re working full-time and supporting a family or not working at all, you feel it. Even if you’re standing out on a corner with a ‘will work for food’ sign, those donations are down.”

With most of his campaigning limited to the weekend, Cecil said he has met with voters at Tea Party events and attended a meeting of the Black Political Caucus in Charlotte, where he was met with a friendly reception and detected a modest degree of curiosity about his platform.

“Until a few years ago, most of them thought they could withstand the tax burden,” he said. “It didn’t seem to be that bad. The explosion in the last two years of new taxes and warnings of ‘we’re going to have new taxes’ have set off alarm bells. People recognize the adage that nothing is free. You have to pay for it some way.”

One of the three focal points of Cecil’s campaign is “bring our troops home.” That message has resonated well with military families that have loved ones deployed abroad, the candidate said.

“Veterans of Iraq and World War II are against our current policies,” Cecil said. “They smell too much like Vietnam. It’s not productive for our nation, and it’s detrimental to our youth.”

That sentiment somewhat dovetails with the position taken by Democratic Senate nominee Elaine Marshall, who has been critical of President Obama’s escalation of the war in Afghanistan.

Cecil said there’s a difference between the two camps.

“The liberal Democrat position is bring home our army and reduce it to 15 people with shotguns,” he said. “I feel we do need a reasonable sized army. We have to be able to respond. We should not have to be calling out our National Guard to defend the Mexican border, the Canadian border or from a boatload coming into Florida.”

Sizing up his two opponents, Cecil holds a more favorable view of Democrat Mel Watt than Republican nominee Greg Dority.

“The Republican that is running is a long-term resident of Washington, NC, which is a three-hour road trip from the eastern part of the state,” Cecil said. “He made the statement that if he won he would move here. I already live here. He’s going to vote straight Republican.”

In contrast, Cecil said, “Mel does represent many of [his constituents'] interests. Mel had done a good job. He’s had that seat since 1992. He’s been on the finance committee, which is very significant. He’s very effective at bringing money to the colleges in the area and bringing in money for public works.”

Watt should consider running against US Sen. Kay Hagan in 2014 or making a bid for the governor’s mansion, Cecil said. In the meantime, this year there are three candidates and only one seat available for the 12th Congressional District.

“We need in Congress someone who is not willing to rubber stamp every expenditure, someone who would ask questions about how is this going to affect everybody in North Carolina, someone who is going to consider what the unintended consequences might be," he said. "I am an engineer. An engineer wants to look at everything together and consider the unintended consequences. A good example is that Mel Watt voted for the healthcare reform bill. I am extremely interested in voting all of that out.”

As a Libertarian, Cecil is by definition interested in reducing the size of government.

“I’m painfully constitutionalist,” he said. “I believe we need an itty bitty federal government that only gets its funding from the states.”

In other words, the federal government would operate on fees contributed by the states.

“I would like to see the US Department of Education close down,” Cecil said. “The US Department of Education provides 7 percent of the funding to North Carolina schools. If you go through the numbers, it looks like they have a little overhead. [The] Cato [Institute] says 10 percent. We pay 17 percent to the federal government, and we get back 7 percent. Along with the 7 percent, we get no prayer in schools, no invocations before football games and all these regulations that they pass down. And we get do No Child Left Behind. Once we get the federal government out of education, we can look at voucher programs and choice in education.”

Like most libertarians, Cecil said he believes some limited areas of activity — the military, most notably — make sense in the public sector. In other realms, he favors moving gradually but deliberately to reduce the size and scope of government.

“All areas of the government need to minimize growth,” he said. “The Army’s big enough. The Coast Guard is big enough. The IRS is too big. The Fed — which is not a public agency — we need to get rid of that.”

The Postal Service is an example of an agency that Cecil said doesn’t need to be eliminated entirely, but could be significantly downsized to adjust to changing times.

“I get five or six pieces of mail that are directly related to bills,” Cecil said. “When I send in my payments, I put a stamp on one piece of mail because it’s a government agency that won’t take electronic payment. They all send me a paper form. I send them an electronic payment and throw away the paper. The other 30 or 40 pieces of mail are nothing but junk mail.

“I look at the Post Office, and honestly can’t see why we need to have service more than two or three times a week," he continued. "Spending all that money on gas — I can’t see it. We should be spending that money on getting the internet to be more ubiquitous and accessible. North Carolina trees make perfectly good power poles. We don’t need to be cutting them down to make more paper. If the Postal Service eliminated bulk mail, they’d have to employ far fewer people and we could easily go to delivery twice a week.”

Press conference concerning Capt. Cherry scheduled for tomorrow

The Greensboro Pulpit Forum, the Greensboro branch of the NAACP and the Beloved Community Center announce a press conference tomorrow at 11 a.m. at New Light Missionary Baptist Church to discuss the situation of Capt. Charles Cherry.


Two for two seats on Soil & Water Board

Two people have filed for the two seats open on the Guilford County Soil & Water Board: Richard "Dick" Phillips and Ron Tuck. Unless someone else steps up to the plate, there won't be much of a contest.

Regardless, considering the Alvin Greene debacle in South Carolina and the fact that the victor of this race in 2008 was a candidate named "Kirk Perkins" that never materialized in the flesh, I think we'll be doing some vetting this time around. That said, the two present candidates are most likely people with solid qualifications who are motivated by a desire to render honest public service.

Filing for this race closes next Friday.


City of Greensboro and public housing community settle discrimination lawsuit

Cheryl Gant, the city of Greensboro's fair housing investigator, says that a discrimination lawsuit filed by the city against JT Hairston Memorial Apartments and Westminster Co. on behalf of resident LaTonya Stimpson has been settled out of court.

The city's human relations department is still administratively investigating a few cases on behalf of other residents.

Developing...


May 30 letter from the Revs. Cardes Brown and Nelson Johnson to Mayor Bill Knight and members of the Greensboro City Council

Brown-Johnson letter

This week in YES! Weekly


Eastern Music Festival:Doc Severinsen and El Ritmo de la Vida headline 2010 EMF Fringe, and all of the events and after party listings!

be there: 2010 fifa world cup moments…so far

be there:
SuperJam, KoKo Karate & the Kung Fu Kittens, 2010 Harley's Heros Tour, and more...

dirt: GPD captain responsible for grievances faces fitness-for-duty evaluation, Folwell maintains focus on education, public safety and efficiency, Schools administrator says uniformed officer's presence at dance was proper

scuttlebutt: NC Senate votes to ban electronic sweepstakes, Greensboro bus ridership sees marked increase, Farmers market manager no longer allowed to double as vendor, and more...

editorial: We agree with Harrison’s position on this problem that does not yet exist. but even more, we admire that she did not let the crisis in the Gulf of Mexico go to waste.

letters to the editor

visions: Exclusive interview with Peter Bogdanovich, director of The Dukes

tunes: the blind tiger turns 22, and the inaugural Mosaic Festival

chow: A slice of Manhattan on Tate Street

crash:
Some kind of boycott

More content, updated weekly HERE

Marshall handily defeats Cunningham in US Senate runoff election


Cal Cunningham, a Democratic candidate for US Senate, concedes the Democratic runoff election to Elaine Marshall in Lexington Tuesday night as his family members look on. (Photo by Keith T. Barber)

A humble Cal Cunningham stood before a group of 75 supporters, campaign volunteers and staffers inside the Edward Smith Civic Center in downtown Lexington around 9 p.m. Tuesday night and conceded the US Senate runoff election to Elaine Marshall.

Cunningham said he had contacted Marshall and congratulated her on her victory, and offered Marshall’s campaign his “complete and unequivocal support” to help defeat Republican incumbent Richard Burr this fall.

“I commended her for running an extremely impressive campaign, one that has shown tenacity and grit, [one] that has overcome some tremendous odds that’s shown North Carolinians the type of character that we would expect of our next US Senator,” Cunningham said. “I want you to join me in congratulating her for running a tremendous campaign, for bringing folks together, for being victorious tonight and for taking us one step closer to replacing Richard Burr in the Senate.”

According to unofficial results tallied by the NC State Board of Elections, Marshall, the NC Secretary of State, garnered nearly 60 percent of the votes in Tuesday’s runoff to Cunningham’s 40 percent. Marshall defeated Cunningham, a former state Senator and Bronze Medal recipient, by 9 points in the May 4 primary but failed to gain at least 40 percent of the vote, which led to Tuesday’s runoff.

Marshall attributed her resounding victory to her campaign's message — a message that all North Carolinians could appreciate. Marshall also praised her grassroots organization composed of countless volunteer networks in all 100 North Carolina counties. Marshall said her campaign infrastructure will come in handy as she takes on Burr in the general election.

Many political observers have stated the opinion that Burr is one of the more vulnerable Republicans in this midterm election. A recent survey by Public Policy Polling revealed that more North Carolinians disapprove than approve of the job Burr is doing in the US Senate. Marshall said her campaign will capitalize on voter dissatisfaction.

“It’s a simple matter of putting up contrasts,” Marshall said. “He’s the Senator for big corporations, not the Senator for people.”

In his closing remarks, Cunningham said Marshall won the Democratic nomination due in large part to her “tenacious” style of campaigning and implored his supporters to get behind her campaign to “put this Senate seat back to work for the people of North Carolina.”

Wadsworth wins Democratic runoff for sheriff

Phil Wadsworth pulls out a big win tonight in the Democratic runoff for Guilford County sheriff, besting CB Goins by a 12.4 percent margin.

With turnout at 2.9 percent, the outcome had been tough to predict. In fact, Goins had led in early voting, with a tally of 440 to 339 -- a result perhaps of the fact that he spent several days campaigning in front of the early voting site at the Old County Courthouse. But the Wadsworth campaign had solid strategy for today's runoff. fielding enough volunteers to cover 15 polling places. Wadsworth said his campaign also targeted the voters who came out for the 2006 runoff with phone calls.

"We figured they were pretty dedicated voters," he said.

A retired State Trooper, Wadsworth had not been favored to win the May 4 primary, according to conventional wisdom and, frankly, the local media, including YES! Weekly. Based on the fact that he began his campaign last year and the prestige of his service in the US Marshal's Service, Harlon Costner was widely favored to lead the Democratic ticket, but he was eliminated in the primary.

"Y'all just looked at the cover, but didn't turn to the back pages," Wadsworth said. Predicting that he will turn out incumbent Republican BJ Barnes in the fall, Wadsworth and some of his supporters retorted, "It won't be a fluke." (They let it be known they were not wildly enthusiastic about a particular sentence in YES! Weekly's endorsement editorial last week.)

Wadsworth and his supporters groused that the news media failed to properly vet the two runoff candidates and the prevailing candidate said, "I'm the best qualified, I'm the only one qualified, and I've got the credentials to back it up."

A tired looking CB Goins sat by himself in the commissioners chambers at the Old County Courthouse, and by the time the final results were in he was gone.

"It's been a challenge," he said, reflecting on the campaign. "Win or lose, I thank Jesus Christ." His strategy, he said, was to "put it God's hands."

After the results came in, Wadsworth accepted the well wishes of Guilford County Commissioner Kay Cashion, the one prominent local politician who showed up at the Old County Courthouse to watch the results. Wadsworth took some calls on his cell phone, had his picture made with his volunteers, and began to pivot towards the general election.

"BJ has done a good job; I'm going to do better," he said. "A lot of citizens are ready for a change. I've had several people including Republicans call me and say they're going to vote for me because BJ said he wanted to get reelected to build the jail. I'm not trying to get elected to build the jail. I'm trying to get elected to make Guilford County a better place."

In the major statewide race, Elaine Marshall beat Cal Cunningham by a landslide for the Democratic nomination for US Senate, but Cunningham carried Guilford County by less than 200 votes. Cashion was happy to see Marshall win by such a decisive margin.

The state electoral map, which coded the counties carried by Cunningham in blue, showed a solid block of blue in the upper Piedmont from Alamance County in the east to Wilkes County in the west, and from Stokes County in the north down to Cunningham's native Davidson County in the south. The remainder of the counties, with the exception of New Hanover, went to Marshall.

"We're going to have to target those areas," Cashion said, noting that Democrats' challenges in the Triad are exacerbated by the fact that incumbent Republican Richard Burr is from Winston-Salem.

Earlier in the evening, Gary Palmer of Replacements Limited PAC -- which supports candidates friendly to gay and lesbian interests -- appeared at the courthouse. Palmer had been rooting for Cunningham, but said he would campaign for Marshall in the fall if she ended up leading the ticket and hoped other Cunningham supporters would also let bygones be bygones.

"The mudslinging hasn't been too bad," he said.

In other Guilford County runoffs, Bill Randall's decisive showing against Bernie Reeves in the Republican contest for North Carolina's 13th Congressional District roughly mirrored the statewide outcome, while Winston-Salem resident Scott Cumbie carried Guilford County in the Republican runoff for the 12th Congressional District but lost overall to Greg Dority of Washington, NC.

GPD captain explains why he is undergoing a fitness for duty evaluation

The following is text from an e-mail that was written by Capt. Charles Cherry, commander, Eastern Division, Greensboro Police Department, and sent to officers under his command at 7:21 p.m. on June 17. This document was obtained from an anonymous source. Its authenticity has been confirmed. It has been retyped, but is presented in comprehensive and verbatim form.

Captain Cherry’s Status

Eastern Division Personnel, on Monday June 7, 2010, I was placed on Administrative Duty, pending a Fitness For Duty Evaluation. Keep in mind that a fitness for duty evaluation is a departmental process that an officer may be required to complete, which ultimately benefits the Agency, the officer and the community. It is nothing to be ashamed of or embarrassed about, especially considering the stressful jobs we all hold.

I am going to share this information with you all, primarily, for the following reasons:

• As your Commander, I believe it is my obligation to inform you of my status. If one of you were going through this process, I would be the first to know. I also just think it is the right thing to do.
• City Manager Mr. Rashad Young has a stern policy (and rightfully so) as it relates to malicious gossip and criticism. By informing you, you can be free to speak about the situation with the known facts.
• Since being placed on Administrative Duty, I have seen, spoken to and received phone calls from many of you and also questions relating to my status.
• Giving you this information can be beneficial for officers in the future who go through or have colleagues who go through the process. It may help to alleviate the “stigma” that can some times be associated with a fit for duty process.

Shortly after I was placed on Administrative Duty (Fit For Duty Evaluation), Lieutenant Richey contacted me by telephone. Lieutenant Richey (meaning well as he always does) informed me that he was going to tell the guys that I was just taking time off. I instructed Lieutenant Richey not to do that, but to inform officers that I was going through a Fit For Duty Evaluation, and that I would inform all divisional officers of the exact reasons. I also informed Lieutenant Richey that the minute one of our officers saw me at the MMOB in plain clothes when I was supposed to be taking time off, it could cause issues. I gave Lieutenant Richey basically the same reasoning as noted previously in this e-mail.

Shortly after speaking with Lieutenant Richey, I contacted a Bureau Commander by telephone. As a courtesy, I informed the Bureau Commander of what I was going to do, citing basically the same reasons that I had given to Lieutenant Richey. The Bureau Commmander indicated that I could do that if I wanted, however, they (Senior Command with knowledge) would not release the information. I informed the Bureau Commander that I would read from the Fit For Duty Recommendation Memo given to me, by Senior Command. This would allow for consistent, factual and neutral information.

It should be noted that Departmental Directive 8.2 states, “If a psychological fitness for duty assessment is deemed appropriate, it will be coordinated through the Resource Management Division and the employee will be advised of the specific circumstances that prompted the action.”

I will write the recommendation memo, which will be italicized and I will elaborate slightly to explain the specific criteria utilized, to place me in a fit for duty status. The fit for duty recommendation memo, and my explanations are as follows:

During the past two months, Captain C.E. Cherry has submitted and/or written seven (7) grievances. He has also submitted and/or authored additional responses to the responses he has received. Captain Cherry’s Explanation: This statement is accurate. Four (4) different officers with four (4) unrelated issues came to me and asked for assistance in writing a grievance. As I would with any of you, I looked at their situations, and if they did not have issues to be aggrieved, I would have corrected, redirected and assisted them with handling similar problems in the future. As it turned out, these officers did have issues to be aggrieved and had reached a point (they believed) at which they had exhausted all other avenues of resolution. I did assist the officers in preparing grievances. This action is not in violation of Departmental Directives or City Policy, however, it is part of the criteria as to why I am undergoing a Fit For Duty Evaluation.

The manner in which the documents are constructed, Captain Cherry’s Explanation: The grievances were documented utilizing mandated memo format as expressed by the City Manager’s Office. There was no derogatory or disrespectful language in the memorandums. This action is not a violation of Departmental Directives or City Policy, however, it is a part of the criteria as to why I am undergoing a Fit for Duty Evaluation.

His inability to accept reasonable responses, Captain Cherry’s Explanation: In the grievance process, Departmental Directive 3.9 (Grievance Procedures), certain subject matter can be appealed to the level of the City Manager’s Office. Many of these grievances are at the level of the City Manager or Assistant City Manager awaiting a ruling. If you submit a grievance and it gets to my level as a Captain, I have to respond on paper. You may accept my response, but if you do not agree and are not satisfied, Departmental Directive 3.9 and City Policy H-2 (Complaint Resolution), allows you the opportunity and right to appeal the response to the next level of supervision. Appeals can go all the way up to the City Manager’s Office. That is what the four (4) officers and I have done. Again, the grievances are at the level of the City Manager’s Office. Not “accepting” the supervisor’s “reasonable” response is not a violation of Departmental Directives or City Policy. However, it is a part of the criteria as to why I am undergoing a Fit For Duty Evaluation.

His physical reactions in front of subordinate employees (sworn and non-sworn) during this time period gave rise to concerns for his emotional stability. While it is unknown if this is an emotional stability issue or a performance issue, Captain Cherry was afforded an opportunity to voluntarily seek assistance through the Employee Assistance Program. Captain Cherry's Response: I have not been investigated, sustained and am not currently under any investigation relating to my physical reactions or anything else. I was rated a level (4) on my last evaluation. I have not been counseled as it relates my physical reactions. The Employee Assistance Program is voluntary and confidential. Although there is no violation of Departmental Directives or City Policy, it is a part of the criteria as to why I am undergoing a Fit For Duty Evaluation.

After receiving this offer, Captain Cherry immediately filed two complaints on another employee. Captain Cherry’s explanation: This is an accurate statement. I did file two complaints on another employee. The complaints were on another Division Commander. In one instance, the Commander was telling me and other Commanders that he had cursed out a subordinate sergeant under his command. He then proceeded to call the subordinate sergeant stupid. The second complaint, was on the same commander. After a discussion in the Commander’s office, we were in the hallway and I was walking behind the other Commander. The other Commander turned to me blocked my way and referred to me as a “jerk.” I stepped to the side, made a statement relating to our initial conversation and walked away. The complaint was utilized in the other Commander’s evaluation, according to his Bureau Commander. The fact that the information was utilized in the other commander’s evaluation would lend credence that the complaints were valid. In addition, any employee or citizen can file a complaint should they feel compelled to do so. Filing a complaint is not a violation of Departmental Directives or City Policy, however, it is part of the criteria as to why I am undergoing a fit for duty evaluation.

Based on his overall behavior, Captain Cherry was referred to the Professional Standards Program for review.

After reviewing several grievances, submitted and/or prepared by Captain C.E. Cherry, discussing this issue with him, offering voluntary support through the Employee Assistance Program, and based on a recommendation from the Professional Standards Review Meeting, I have concluded that there is sufficient information to warrant placing Captain C.E. Cherry on Administrative Duty. While he is on Administrative Duty, I recommend that he be evaluated by the Departmental Psychologist regarding his fitness for duty as outline in Departmental Directive 8.2.
Captain Cherry's Explanation: I was told that I should not be writing grievances for officers and it was discussed as to when I wrote grievances and where I wrote grievances. It was determined that I had not violated any City Policy of Departmental Directives. The Professional Standards Review Meeting consisted of two (2) Captains and two (2) Bureau Commanders that reviewed the italicized memo information, other information and made a decision that I needed to undergo a fit for duty evaluation.

Copies of the grievances and all other associated paperwork or emails can be obtained in the Resource Management Division and/or the City Manager’s Office.

I recommend that Captain C.E. Cherry remain on Administrative Duty pending the outcome of the psychological evaluation.


End of Fit For Duty Recommendation Memo, in it’s entirety with explanations.

On Wednesday, June 9, 2010, at 0600, I met with Eastern Division A Squad. This meeting was to explain, from the recommendation memo, as to why I am undergoing a fit for duty evaluation. The diligent, hard working Lieutenant K.A. Walters was also present. As stated earlier, I had informed a Bureau Commander as a courtesy, the day before, of my intentions. The Bureau Commander approved my actions.

On Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 0800, I received a phone call from the Bureau Commander that was aware of and had approved my actions the day before. After a discussion, the Bureau Commander prohibited (banned) me from Maple Street and any line-up, City Wide, until I complete the fit for duty evaluation. The Bureau Commander or any other commander has not articulated to me at this time any violations that I have committed, and I am not under suspension. The Bureau Commander’s memo is italicized and reads as follows:

“Earlier this week you were placed on administrative leave while you are undergoing a fitness for duty assessment. I have arranged to have a private office for you at the Melvin Municipal Office Building while that process occurs. We have designated a lieutenant to perform your command duties at Eastern Division. Until Further notice you are not to attend squad line-ups for Eastern Division or other divisions. You are also not permitted to be at Maple Street facility until you return to full duty.”

End of Bureau Commander’s Memo banning me from Maple Street and Line-Ups City Wide.

Now that the Eastern Division is aware of my status, you can talk about it if you choose to, but you will have all the facts. Thanks to you all, we have a great department, and an incredible division. Remember to:

• Police with Compassion
• Be fair and consistent
• Make your decisions based on right and wrong (don’t let things such as friendships, dislikes of individuals, etc. sway your decisions)
• Keep in mind that mistakes are okay as long as we are willing to learn from them and there was nothing malicious or intentional regarding the mistake

The incomparable Lieutenant G.M. Richey is an excellent leader that we can all learn something from. Continue to follow his lead. I appreciate your concern, calls and conversations. It is always better when we have the same information. Take care and I will see you soon.

Charles E. Cherry, Captain
Greensboro Police Department
City of Greensboro
[phone number redacted by Y!W]
1106 Maple Street
Greensboro, NC 27407
www.greensboro-nc.gov

Wharton: Downtown Design Manual and 'regulatory capture'

New urbanist blogger David Wharton tackles Greensboro’s Downtown Design Manual and the Property Owners Review Team, which has been granted a gate-keeping role in what passes for a regulatory process:

“Imagine how it will make Greensboro look to some experienced outside developers. In what other town must they justify their projects to a board whose voting members must be chosen on the basis of a property qualification, but who need not have any professional expertise or demonstrated success? They will think they have arrived in a jerkwater town where everything is run by the local good ole boy network.”

The public comment period remains open through Thursday. Comments can be e-mailed to Mike Kirkman at Michael.kirkman@greensboro-nc.gov.


Doc Watson beats Jim Kaat to the Hall of Fame

Why it took even as long as the second class of inductees to elect Doc Watson to the NC Music Hall of Fame is unclear, but one of the most revered figures in all of music will be enshrined into the still-sparkly and new Hall on October 7, 2010. See below for the full list.

Performing Artists

Maurice Williams, Recording artist, Charlotte
Andy Griffith, Gospel recording artist, Mt. Airy/Wilmington
Donna Fargo, Country recording artist, Mt. Airy
Arthur Smith, Country composer, performer, producer, Charlotte
George Hamilton IV, Country recording artist, Winston-Salem
Doc Watson, Country/Bluegrass vocalist, musician, Deep Gap/N. Wilkesboro
Curly Seckler, Bluegrass vocalist and musician, China Grove
Dr. Billy Taylor, jazz pianist, composer, Greenville
Shirley Caesar, Gospel recording artist, Durham

Performing Artists (Deceased)

Don Gibson, Country recording artist & composer, Shelby
Les Brown, Big Band leader, Durham
Oliver, (William Oliver Swofford), Recording artist, N. Wilkesboro

Non-Performing Artists

Don Schlitz, Composer, guitarist and soloist, Durham

The induction ceremony will be held Thursday, October 7, 2010 in the David H. Murdock Core Laboratory Building in Kannapolis, NC and will be open to the public. The evening will include a reception, dinner and induction ceremony with a variety of entertainment. Tickets go on sale September 1st at the museum and online.


The Hall was created in 2009 and is located in Kannapolis. Previous inductees include Earl Scruggs, George Clinton, Roberta Flack, and Mike Curb.

Fecund Stench: Wilkins for council

Fecund Stench endorses Guilford County GOP Executive Director Tony Wilkins for Greensboro City Council.

Will it hurt or help?