tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7620598390715460127.post6398085358233806073..comments2023-11-03T06:03:17.731-04:00Comments on The YES! Weekly Blog: Sunshine and food for thoughtCharleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13612776268354792545noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7620598390715460127.post-28445578759201195622010-02-05T17:54:58.570-05:002010-02-05T17:54:58.570-05:00Hmm, might have to look into this one.
The arro...Hmm, might have to look into this one. <br /><br />The arrogance of it rubs me the wrong way.Samuel Spagnolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13762843298635492811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7620598390715460127.post-77643818147037403702010-02-05T12:09:52.470-05:002010-02-05T12:09:52.470-05:00City Attorney Terry Woods states in response to th...City Attorney Terry Woods states in response to the hotel group On Jan. 14: "Upon quick review of the proposal my inclination is that tax ID numbers are not public and much of the Business Plan, pp. 7-10 could be confidential, with the attachments. The rest of the proposal appears to be pretty ordinary information and would not fall under the definition of trade secret."<br /><br />Much of the proposal is redacted — the business plan, I assume, along with the tax ID numbers. I haven't given serious thought to challenging the city's redactions, but I wonder what others think.Jordan Greenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04557465835080238650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7620598390715460127.post-76059352017980043342010-02-05T11:46:04.750-05:002010-02-05T11:46:04.750-05:00State law does allow for the protection of "t...State law does allow for the protection of "trade secrets." As much as I think the City overreaches in keeping information from the public, this one appears to be justifiable, if not justified.Roch101https://www.blogger.com/profile/09051431871719164688noreply@blogger.com