Showing posts with label Wendell Sawyer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wendell Sawyer. Show all posts

Candidate profile: Wendell Sawyer

















I spent almost two hours today with Wendell Sawyer, a Republican candidate for NC House, at his law office on Battleground Avenue in Greensboro. The seat Sawyer is seeking is currently represented by Democrat Pricey Harrison. To secure a place on the ballot in November, Sawyer must first defeat Republican opponent Jon Hardister, a 27-year-old mortgage company vice president who is running an energetic primary campaign.

Sawyer is something of an anomaly in politics. He attended junior high school in Greensboro with NC Sen. Don Vaughan and former Mayor Keith Holliday, but he doesn’t really circulate in the same social circles as power brokers. He won election to the NC Senate in 1984 and served one term, but said the state Republican Party didn’t give him any support or expect him to win, and he didn’t see eye to eye with party leadership once in office. He’s a fiscal conservative, but deplores the demonization exhibited by both major parties towards the other. He doesn’t talk much with the Republican Party organization in Guilford County and confesses, “I don’t know what they think of me.”

Most vexing, for some, he doesn’t campaign. That can come across as indifference, even a lack of respect for the electorate. It begs the question: Why should people give up their time and resources to support a candidate who won’t invest any effort in his own campaign?

Now 59, Sawyer said he’s too busy to campaign. He and his wife have six children, the eldest 27 and the youngest 16, with a couple in between in college. It would be hard to scale back his caseload without his business going bankrupt, Sawyer told me. “I work all the time. I work weekends. I work nights.”

I asked the obvious question: If he can’t find time to campaign, where would he find time to serve?

“That’s something I have to address,” Sawyer said. “I asked my wife. She said, ‘You’ll just have to make it work.' In the long session, which falls on every odd year, you really have to spend a lot of time in Raleigh. That would be really difficult for me. I’ve got to be up front about it.”

If there had never been such thing as the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in American politics, elected officials might be something like Wendell Sawyer.

We started by talking about the state’s massive budget shortfall.

“You’ve got to either raise taxes or cut spending,” Sawyer said. “Of course, I’m on the side of cutting taxes.”

Sawyer is not among the Republicans that accuse the Democratic majority in the NC General Assembly of reckless spending. That’s a charge he doesn’t feel qualified to make. He would like to see a bipartisan commission established to review the state budget for waste, fraud and pet projects.

“I don’t see why anybody liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican would disagree with that,” he said. “I don’t think anybody is in favor of waste, fraud and sweetheart deals.”

Sawyer expressed a sense of futility about making a positive impact on the political process.

“If the Democrats maintain control, it’s really hard,” he said. “You have the leadership that determines what gets considered. Republican bills are not going to be seriously considered. Whenever the Republicans are out of power, they tend to say we need to cut spending. Then they get power and they tend to soften on that. Look at what happened when Bush was in office.”

He drew an imaginary line graph in the air showing a pronounced incline.

“The Republicans lose their credibility when that happens,” Sawyer continued. “When they held the House [in Raleigh] they blew their credibility.”

Abuses by the leadership in both parties and unconstructive partisanship is a consequence of legislative districts being drawn to ensure that incumbents in both parties can win easy reelection, Sawyer argued. As a result, political competition is discouraged and the victors tend to represent the extremes of political discourse.

Again, Sawyer’s solution is an independent or nonpartisan commission.

“The question is how can you do it,” he said. “It would have to be people that both sides agree to. They would base it on community demographics and continuity. The Justice Department would have to approve it based on the Voting Rights Act. They’ll reject anything that appears to dilute minority representation.”

Sawyer said he sees it as imperative that office holders learn to get along with and listen to political opponents. Otherwise they run the risk of making a lot of noise, but remaining ineffective.

“When that partisanship thing gets ratcheted up, all reason goes out the window. ‘We’re going to kick your butt and show you who’s boss.’ I’m against it, both when the Democrats do it and when the Republicans do it.”

His fiscal conservatism has gotten him in trouble, even within his own party. Sawyer told me that the year he was elected, Republican politicians “roundly criticized” Democratic Gov. Jim Hunt for gasoline taxes. The transportation secretary under newly elected Republican Gov. Jim Martin proposed an idea called the Strategic Corridor that would — wait for it — require raising gasoline taxes.

“I was opposed to it,” the one-time state senator recalled. “They said, ‘Wendell, this is a Republican administration.’ I’ve always thought: If you believe in something, be for it.”

On some traditionally conservative issues, Sawyer is in line with other North Carolina Republicans. For instance, he’s against corporate incentives. He also opposes forced annexation, although he told me he can sympathize with municipalities that have to maintain services that are used by people who live outside their corporate limits commuting in to work. As he described it, people who work in cities are fleeing to subdivisions out in the county to avoid taxes and crime, and cities are chasing after them trying to recover revenue. Still, Sawyer told me he believes county residents deserve to have a say in whether they become city residents.

“I got in the middle of a fight over annexation,” Sawyer said. “It was over Colfax, of all things. “They didn’t want to be annexed. I supported them. They wanted to incorporate. We had a Senate bill for that. Greensboro and High Point went bananas because they had already carved it up between themselves.”

Sawyer is a Catholic, for whom faith matters. And his Catholicism gives him a compassionate and convicted sensibility that puts him at odds with the orthodoxies of both major political parties.

There’s one issue, he told me, that he would have to vote according to his conscience rather than what was most popular with constituents in District 57. That’s abortion.

“I consider myself a pro-life person,” Sawyer said. “That’s just an issue I feel very strongly about. And I would vote that way.”

I asked Sawyer for his thoughts on undocumented immigrants, considering that the Democratic incumbent, Pricey Harrison, has taken the politically unpopular stance of supporting undocumented students’ right to attend community colleges. That’s the opposite of many North Carolina Republicans. For example, four years ago, Guilford County Republican Party Chairman Bill Wright ran for NC House District 60 on a platform of “aggressively pursuing illegal immigrants, including checking legal status when someone is treated at a hospital” (to quote from a dispatch by News & Record reporter Mark Binker).

Again, Sawyer returned to his religious faith.

“I’m a Catholic,” he said. “I’m not a person who says I’m against immigrants, period. I’m not. They’re humans like us. That’s the starting point for me. I’d like to see a process where people could become citizens if they wanted to, and if they didn’t want to, then send them back. They do contribute a lot to society. They do jobs other people don’t want to do. If we deported them all, I think a lot of people would be hurting suddenly.”

As a lawyer whose practice includes a significant number of traffic cases, Sawyer said time and again he’s represented Hispanic clients who come to him without driver’s licenses because the state tightened its laws in 2006 to prevent people not authorized to be in the country from receiving driving privileges.

“I know that there are so many people driving around without driver’s licenses because I’ve had them as clients,” Sawyer said. “I ask them for a driver’s license, and they show me one that’s expired. They’ve been here working for many years, but they changed the rules so they can’t get their licenses renewed. They have to work and they have to have a way to get to work. When they have a driver’s license, then they get insurance for their car. They get their car registered. They’re driving around late at night in fear because they don’t have insurance and they’re afraid of getting in an accident. We need to bring this to the light of day. We need to make them citizens, so we can withhold Social Security taxes.”

“I’m not really sure what the other side that says they shouldn’t have licenses wants,” he continued. “You want them to walk to work? I know they’re response: They shouldn’t be there in the first place.”

There's something rare about Wendell Sawyer for a politician: He seems not to care that much that a position in which he holds great passion and conviction is out of line with the prevailing sentiments of his party and, most likely, the leanings of the electorate in his district.


Triad Elections '10

Joseph Rahenkamp, Republican candidate for Guilford County Commission at-large

Joseph Rahenkamp nominally answered questions at a candidates forum at the Greensboro Historical Museum on May 1. Rahenkamp was the only candidate for an at-large Guilford County Commission seat in the Republican primary to attend, although Wendell Sawyer answered the same questions in writing. Along with Rahenkamp and Sawyer, former Ku Klux Klan exalted cyclops EH Hennis, Guilford County Planning Board Chairman Larry Proctor and Rudy Binder are also on the ballot.

The two candidates who win the most votes in the Republican primary will advance to the general election in November, where they will face Democratic incumbents Paul Gibson and John Parks.

Asked whether he favored the property tax or the sales tax as a means to raise revenue, Rahenkamp responded that more prize money should be paid out by the North Carolina lottery to increase ticket sales.

Rahenkamp: “I don’t approve of either one. You’re going to have to start working and getting smarter and make what money you got work out. If you go back and check, every year, there’s greater and greater monies coming in and raising the tax base. We’re going to have to start making it work out. People right now, a lot of them are losing their homes, losing their cars and losing their trucks…. You’re going to have to hold the line and get smarter. [This] is and it is not going to answer your question. Come back to raising this money with this school bond. You need to take this lottery, where they’re taking 50 percent right now for the schools, drop it back and put 10 percent in it, and by doing that… you’re going to have more people buying tickets, and it’s going to generate your revenue. It’s going to be more than it is right now.”

Note: About 35 percent of the proceeds from the North Carolina lottery go to the Education Lottery Fund at the Office of State Budget and Management, while at least 50 percent is paid out in prizes.

Rahenkamp did not respond to a question about whether he supports a proposed jail bond, except to say that he opposes raising taxes. He also did not respond to a second question about whether the county was adequately pursuing alternatives to incarceration such as funding drug treatment programs.

Rahenkamp: “I’m not for raising taxes for anything…. It comes right back to what I just said. People are hurting. They’re losing their homes. They don’t know how they’re going to make it. And I do not believe when someone is drowning you take and push ’em down…. We’re going to have to get smarter. That’s where it comes back with the school board we were just talking. Education… you’ve got to get smarter in all of your categories. You’d be surprised what you can do with stuff when you have to do it.”

Rahenkamp suggested he favors a lenient approach to illegal immigration, but did not answer a question about whether he thought it was a good idea for the Guilford County Sheriff’s Office to participate in federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s 287(g), which authorizes local law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration law.

Rahenkamp: “Well, you’ve got a big problem there. You’ve got an awful lot of people in this country that are in here illegally, okay? What you’ve got to do is take the bull by the horns. They are in here. Let them start paying their way like everybody else. You’re not going to get away from it. You turn right around, you put them across the border, they’re gonna come right back in here, maybe come back in another way. Maybe they might not come to Guilford County; maybe they might come to LA County. Let ’em start paying their way like the rest of us.”

Position statements: Wendell Sawyer, candidate for Guilford County commissioner

Wendell Sawyer, a Republican candidate for Guilford County Commission at-large was not present at the May 1 candidates forum, in which I asked questions. His opponents in the Republican primary on May 6 are Guilford County Planning Board Chairman Larry Proctor, former Ku Klux Klan exalted cyclops EH Hennis, Rudy Binder and Joseph Rahenkamp.

Sawyer sent these responses. All other candidates are welcome to send in responses, too. E-mail me at jordan@yesweekly.com, and I’ll provide you with the three questions.

Sawyer did not respond directly to a question about whether he favored property taxes or sales taxes as sources of revenue; instead he called for tightening the county budget.

“The factors that you mentioned are the result of the slumping national economy and the resulting credit crunch, not to mention soaring gasoline prices. At this point in time, many folks feel compelled to tighten their belts and make sacrifices. As the home mortgage crisis unfolds, some people are going to have difficulty in making their mortgage payments. When the county property tax increases, it merely aggravates the severity of the problem since the county bills the escrow accounts of the mortgage companies with the increased taxes and the mortgage companies simply increase the monthly mortgage payments of their customers to make up the shortfall.

“It is my belief that the county government should engage in this belt-tightening as well. Therefore, I think that the county board should decrease the property tax rate, not increase it or merely “hold the line.” This could be accomplished by re-examining the budget from top to bottom and eliminating certain unnecessary expenditures including some administration costs.”

Sawyer said he opposes the jail bond, but did not respond to the second part of the question, which asked whether the county is doing enough to develop alternatives to incarceration.

“I am opposed to the $114 million jail bond for several reasons. First of all, we simply cannot afford such a massive expenditure. Even though I do believe that we need to increase the bed space at the jail in Greensboro, there are less expensive ways of accomplishing this goal. By simply renovating the existing jail and making additions to the structure, we can save the taxpayers millions of dollars and prevent the eventual massive increases in property taxes.

“Second, I have a problem with the excessive construction fees that are forecast. For example, in Des Moines, Iowa, they are completing the construction of a new jail this year with a 1,500-bed capacity (that can be expanded to 2,500) for $68 million. Why does the proposed new jail in Guilford County with just a 1,000 bed capacity cost $114 million?”

Sawyer said he needs to study the 287(g) program more. Sponsored by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the program authorizes local sheriff’s offices and police departments to enforce immigration law.

“For the most part, I don’t have a problem with such a partnership. However, I would want more information as to the costs involved and how much such involvement may affect the local law enforcement responsibilities of the sheriff’s office.”

Preview: NC Senate 28, Guilford County Commission and Guilford County School Board candidates

I got the opportunity to ask questions of incumbent NC Sen. Katie Dorsett and challenger Bruce Davis, a Guilford County commissioner, at a debate sponsored by Concerned Citizens of Northeast Greensboro at the Greensboro Historical Museum last night.

At-large candidates for Guilford County School Board and Republican candidates for at-large Guilford County Commission seats (the Democratic primary isn't competitive) were also invited. Among the at-large school board candidates, Sandra Alexander, Alan Hawkes and Michael McKinney were present; EC Huey and David Crawford were not. Inexplicably, only one county commission candidate, Joseph Rahenkamp, showed up. Rudy Binder, EH Hennis, Larry Proctor and Wendell Sawyer were missing in action.

I'll be posting excerpts of the candidate's responses, along with School Board Chaiman Alan Duncan's call for support for the school bond referenda, over the weekend. Our print edition comes out after the election, so time is of the essence.